| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | EVGA Classified SR-2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 16.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 6060 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130424 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '17 at 13:02 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
|
73.4%
Very good
|
70% 125 Pts
|
72% 610 Pts
|
97% 1,574 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
|
54.5%
Above average
|
56% 66.3 fps
|
51% 63.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 6x4GB
6 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.5%
Average
|
51% 18 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
40% 99.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 14x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 Fury-XAMD $781Bench 59%, 8,241 samples | 6x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $922 |