Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	ASRock FATAL1TY Z170 GAMING K4 (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '17 at 12:29
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 134 2-Core 258 91% 162 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 747 79% 634 Pts	64-Core 732 45% 732 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 22DD) CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 34.5 22% 31.2 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 25.7 Splatting 34.3 25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB 2,683 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3106000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4295360516 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 49 219043332133 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 4294967297 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 10 (EA) Unknown 100 100 39 (F1) Unknown 253 253 25 (F2) Unknown 253 253 17 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	48.6% Average	Read 437 Write 132 Mixed 383 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 2.32 62% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 13 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 2.99 43% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 27GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	8.65% Terrible	Read 40.9 Write 6.7 Mixed 7.02 16% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.05 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 20% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.65% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 2x8GB 894 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	80.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 22.1 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 25.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	42x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	42x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	34x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $653

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16