Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '17 at 04:26
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 102
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 198
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 36.3
Parallax 33.6
32% 36.4 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 35
Splatting 31.8
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
223GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 475
Write 241
Mixed 278
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 15.4
82% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 64.9
68% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
205GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 475
Write 256
Mixed 330
78% 354 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 16.2
85% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 67.5
70% 115 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 492
Write 310
Mixed 378
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 11.5
67% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 33.5
30% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 139
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.21
83% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 125
Write 157
Mixed 151
109% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.14
72% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 106%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2013)-$60
431GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 107
Mixed 98.4
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.32
110% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $303
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback