ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 131-HE-E095
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160527
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '17 at 21:59
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 824 82% 666 Pts	64-Core 1,040 64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1603 MHz, MLim: 1860 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 373.6 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 120 Parallax 110 91% 114 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 102 Splatting 92.8 80% 98.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2TB free Firmware: MKAOAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 83 (03) Spinup time 126 126 51579847272 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 966 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 30 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3774 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 620 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1081 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1081 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 193274249242 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	11.8% Very poor	Read 110 Write 106 Mixed 88.5 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.32 3% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 16%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 713GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7470 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 977 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 53 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 43 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18182856074	123% Outstanding	Read 527 Write 499 Mixed 519 115% 515 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 51.2 183% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 169 176% 288 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 103GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9921 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1204 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 52 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9365636029	123% Outstanding	Read 526 Write 498 Mixed 518 115% 514 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 51.5 181% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 177 181% 296 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 124%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 825 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 212GB free Firmware: 040B Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 137 Write 101 Mixed 62 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.18 4K Write 7.11 4K Mixed 0.7 258% 3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 89%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 336GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 93.4 Write 75.7 Mixed 78.2 103% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.14 59% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 3,679 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 47 MC Write 49.4 MC Mixed 45.2 135% 47.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 26.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback