Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '17 at 03:16
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 149 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 240 33% 242 Pts	64-Core 244 15% 244 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 33 Reflection 36.1 Parallax 39.4 27% 36.2 fps	MRender 31 Gravity 26.9 Splatting 42.4 28% 33.4 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 2,108 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXV71MT0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 550 Write 136 Mixed 215 65% 300 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 23.7 141% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 76.8 87% 152 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 105%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: MK7OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 89 (03) Spinup time 127 127 25802506721 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2753 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 29 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3956 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1530 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2753 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2753 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 240518037533 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	85.8% Excellent	Read 155 Write 144 Mixed 114 103% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.45 126% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 16G-D3-2400-MR CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 16G-D3-2400-MR 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2132, 2132, 2132, 2132 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 17.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	12x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	10x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSDSC2BB080G4 80GBIntelBench 76%, 6 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	7x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	4x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $437

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16