Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101115
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '17 at 09:52
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 106 52% 81.2 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 318 33% 266 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435 6,727 User benchmarks, average bench 36% XFX(1682 3212) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.1% Below average	Lighting 42.3 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 52.8 34% 41.7 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 45.5 Splatting 37 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 40%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5856 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2350 (B1) Unknown 95 95 53 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 61 (EB) Unknown 99 99 44 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16067535917	28.2% Poor	Read 302 Write 62.7 Mixed 77.1 32% 147 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 8.47 35% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 46.1 DQ Mixed 8.23 14% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.4% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.1 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.4 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-870A-UD3 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	33x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	12x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	9x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	43x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	41x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16