Asus Rampage II GENE

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage II GENE (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110919
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '17 at 23:40
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 141 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 348 36% 293 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2877) 2GB CLim: 1278 MHz, MLim: 1602 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Lighting 26.9 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 32.6 22% 27.9 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 31.5 Splatting 26.3 25% 31 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4019 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 983 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 52 (AE) Unknown 100 100 14 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 58 180389347360 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 12986376092 (F7) Unknown 100 100 410480715 (F8) Unknown 100 100 471620569	51.3% Above average	Read 266 Write 256 Mixed 263 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 15.7 78% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 57.4 DQ Mixed 15.7 19% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 97%
WD WD5000AAKB-00H8A0 500GB 1,191 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 106GB free Firmware: 05.04E05 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 162 160 4858 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5496 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 4 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8817 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1907 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 127 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5496 (C2) HDA temperature 114 93 33 (C4) Reallocation count 198 198 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.9% Below average	Read 52.7 Write 61.6 Mixed 45.3 40% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.34 91% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 46%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 121GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (03) Spinup time 74 74 8720 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 4911 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10331 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18101 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3749 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 99 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 140 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 55 487456797 (C2) HDA temperature 72 55 504234012 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 31959910 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	52.6% Above average	Read 83.6 Write 99.5 Mixed 98.2 71% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.37 103% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage II GENE Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II GENE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	106x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	26x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	17x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	8x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	39x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	35x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $245

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16