Lenovo 3354AVG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3354AVG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3354AVG
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '17 at 01:50
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 110
54% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 165
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5006) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.99 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.22
4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 Pro. 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYRA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 503
Write 473
Mixed 498
110% 491 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 14.8
68% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 47.7
DQ Mixed 14.9
32% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback