Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '17 at 07:15
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 89.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 420 58% 429 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Device(0000 0000) 3GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41% Average	Lighting 48.7 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 57.4 40% 50.6 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 53.4 Splatting 45.5 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 357 Write 234 Mixed 284 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 20.7 90% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 65 75% 132 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 105GB free Firmware: MX4O Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 106 Write 110 Mixed 99.6 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.18 78% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB 4,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16