PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z77-HD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20121024 |
Uptime | 4.6 Days |
Run Date | Mar 07 '17 at 07:39 |
Run Duration | 334 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 5.9 GHz, turbo 7.65 GHz (avg)
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.6%
Above average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.1%
Above average
|
||||
22.7%
Poor
|
||||
Corsair Voyager 8GB
2GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
6.1%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
37.3%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 88x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 62x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 54x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 25x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $480 |