Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-E (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '17 at 22:57
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 61 38% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 56.6 8-Core 59.7 8% 58.2 Pts	64-Core 60.3 4% 60.3 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 358.50 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 20.4 Parallax 15.6 14% 17.8 fps	MRender 0.71 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 20.7 12% 13.2 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -52475909513005 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1942 (B5) Unknown 0 0 4 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1942 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 317567 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 317567 (F2) Unknown 100 100 401521 (F9) Unknown 100 100 11592	34.1% Below average	Read 182 Write 90 Mixed 106 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 8.07 66% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 91.3 DQ Mixed 7.11 20% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 80%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 691GB free Firmware: 01.01V01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 171 4375 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8357 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21525 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2699 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 182 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8174 (C2) HDA temperature 98 95 49 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.3% Above average	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 85.5 72% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.32 112% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 39GB free Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7552 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13247 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27254 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3259 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 50 49 (C2) HDA temperature 91 88 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 23408921 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	46.2% Average	Read 76.7 Write 84.2 Mixed 36.7 48% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.41 99% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	55x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	18x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	16x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	14x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	7x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	129x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	24x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16