Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '17 at 10:13
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 232
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 742
67% 565 Pts
64-Core 1,318
82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 80.9
53% 71.3 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 63
Splatting 56.2
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
177GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 511
Write 412
Mixed 414
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 33.5
124% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 19.4
34% 63 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,674
Write 1,235
Mixed 1,370
386% 1,760 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 20.2
131% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 44.8
DQ Write 72.3
DQ Mixed 21.1
26% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 223%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
915GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 182
Mixed 146
130% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.31
105% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB
586GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62% Good
Read 104
Write 112
Mixed 66.8
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.49
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
Samsung STORY Station 1TB
278GB free, PID 5f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 32.1
Mixed 35.3
44% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.34
69% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
204GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 61.3
Write 61.8
Mixed 49.4
73% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.13
57% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 30.5
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $855
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback