| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140407 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 17 '17 at 02:33 |
| Run Duration | 101 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.2%
Good
|
60% 98.3 Pts
|
42% 341 Pts
|
27% 433 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
19% 21.4 fps
|
18% 22.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 3TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
|
118%
Outstanding
|
143% 191 MB/s
|
258% 2.64 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1866C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.8%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
52% 76.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |