Asrock H61M-GE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-GE  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '17 at 16:27
Run Duration515 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 401
53% 400 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.69
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 17.2
16% 18 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 17.2
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.44
2% 1.74 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.89 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 95.4
Mixed 33.6
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.34
91% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
212GB free
Firmware: PB3OCA1G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 75
Write 66.8
Mixed 5.03
35% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.36
84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721680PLA380 80GB-$41
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P21OABBA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 15.9
Mixed 11
13% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.06
11% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 40%
Wilk 16GB
14GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 3.9
Mixed 5.29
8% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.006
16% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-083.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-GE Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $288
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback