Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170X-UD5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5-CF  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '17 at 03:13
Run Duration374 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 103
2-Core 213
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 416
52% 394 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.5% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 76.5
49% 67.3 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 54
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
25GB free
Firmware: C675 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 439
Mixed 434
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 33.1
135% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 84.7
126% 238 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Patrio Pyro 60GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
Read 189
Write 62.9
Mixed 92.7
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 11.8
86% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 27.4
38% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
812GB free
Firmware: CC4A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 92.8
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.52
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
151GB free
Firmware: CC3C
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 82
Write 80
Mixed 71.2
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.54
97% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
9GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 51
Mixed 66.7
49% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 57%
Corsair Voyager 32GB
14GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Read 30.8
Write 6.82
Mixed 7.66
14% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.28
4K Write 0.001
4K Mixed 0.01
24% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-UD5-CF Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $463
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback