User System

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT A_M_I
Motherboard	Gigabyte B75M-D3V
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131023
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '17 at 08:44
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 83.5 2-Core 170 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 292 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Palit(1569 1004) 3GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.6% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 50.5 Parallax 65.1 48% 58.1 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 65.1 Splatting 48.2 47% 59.1 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1733 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 540 (B1) Unknown 98 98 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 62 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 342 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4406370918	69.6% Good	Read 487 Write 270 Mixed 274 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 25.5 104% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 54.3 DQ Mixed 13.3 19% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 114%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 208GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 1 1691 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7704 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10642 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4368 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 425 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 146 146 163915 (C2) HDA temperature 125 81 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	29.9% Poor	Read 51 Write 52.9 Mixed 49.7 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.35 96% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 32%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 161GB free Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 352 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1911 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 87190008 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3381 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1014 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 48 437321752 (C2) HDA temperature 24 52 51539607576 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 36 352 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -89215060668911 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3353832434 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2582267531	58.4% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 104 Mixed 104 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.52 96% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 88%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 101GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 2x8GB 1,305 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	44.1% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)