PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110323 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 01 '17 at 23:31 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
||||
71.2%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 34x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 22x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 15x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |