PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A1 |
Memory | 81 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130920 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Apr 05 '17 at 21:54 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
|
71%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 6000
Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.86
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples | 2x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 2x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 2x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 1x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $130 |