Asrock P55M Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock P55M Pro  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '17 at 17:41
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 142
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 282
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Gigabyte(1458 228E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 81.8
55% 70.1 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 77.1
54% 63.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.9% Above average
Read 229
Write 214
Mixed 185
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 20.2
87% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 75.9
DQ Mixed 21.1
26% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 116%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
3TB free
Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
174GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 84.8
Write 136
Mixed 8.75
55% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.15
64% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
0GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 151
Write 104
Mixed 33
70% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.14
81% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P55M Pro Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P55M Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $151
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback