| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Latitude E6510 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0N5KHN |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100810 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 09 '17 at 23:52 |
| Run Duration | 326 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.9%
Average
|
54% 89.9 Pts
|
23% 169 Pts
|
11% 171 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.3%
Terrible
|
1% 1.53 fps
|
2% 2.08 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$50
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
45% 58.9 MB/s
|
94% 0.86 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Flash Disk 64GB
17GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
3.37%
Terrible
|
8% 8.51 MB/s
|
1% 0.08 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.4%
Poor
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
19% 6.57 GB/s
|
35% 114 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6510 Builds (Compare 318 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6510
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples | 66x |
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 63x |
| Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples | 50x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples | 314x |
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $221 |