Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170410
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '17 at 18:39
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 196 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 682 64% 533 Pts	64-Core 1,078 67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6274) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 111 Parallax 96.6 91% 107 fps	MRender 96.1 Gravity 97.4 Splatting 97.8 80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L3 SSD 240GB 463 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 104GB free Firmware: SAFM01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7482 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2159 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1457 (AD) Unknown 100 100 589848 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 891 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2145	82.5% Excellent	Read 520 Write 437 Mixed 470 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 12.3 102% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 16.8 48% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 99%
Mushkin ECO3 240GB-$99 848 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 81GB free Firmware: P0330AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 38 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 607 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 18 (A3) Unknown 100 100 293 (94) Unknown 100 100 15972 (95) Unknown 100 100 248 (96) Unknown 100 100 56 (97) Unknown 100 100 215 (A4) Unknown 100 100 6405 (A5) Unknown 100 100 26 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 5 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 94 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 36426173579289 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 24975 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11493 (F5) Unknown 100 100 37829 (F6) Unknown 100 100 31944 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	65.9% Good	Read 489 Write 258 Mixed 274 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 17.8 91% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 12.2 30% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 99%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 582ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 11038890 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 135866995450656 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2566 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 943 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11038890 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11038890 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11038890 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 8589934593 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10257 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6120 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6120 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4020	65.3% Good	Read 496 Write 144 Mixed 199 61% 280 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 14.7 103% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 9.49 47% 106 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 570GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 151 8983 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9571 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31568 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4053 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 690 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 135 135 197751 (C2) HDA temperature 122 90 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.7% Above average	Read 107 Write 73.6 Mixed 92.7 69% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.16 65% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 233GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 100 42290960 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3610 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1186613 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6141 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1722 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 57 420872217 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 379 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7060 (C2) HDA temperature 25 43 68719476761 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -14890651613869 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3424207160 (F2) Unknown 100 253 110341859052	81.6% Excellent	Read 142 Write 142 Mixed 136 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.24 84% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 112%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 194GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 66 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896829621 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1644 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 103 103 39 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2561 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 746 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1644 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1644 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 154619936795 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	72.9% Very good	Read 148 Write 106 Mixed 89.4 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.18 59% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16G-D4-2400-MR 2x8GB 3,744 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	84% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 28.7 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 22.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)