Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '17 at 16:42
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 198 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 626 60% 498 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 53% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 150GB free Firmware: DXT07B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7202 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3081 (B1) Unknown 88 88 121 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 50 47 50 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 138 (F1) Unknown 99 99 36258030986	58.1% Above average	Read 511 Write 245 Mixed 220 71% 325 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 5.25 60% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 7.66 DQ Mixed 12.1 40% 94 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2907 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 546 (B1) Unknown 98 98 41 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 44 41 56 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 73 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27165256191	83.7% Excellent	Read 508 Write 400 Mixed 410 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 31.7 113% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.2 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 86.3 68% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 365GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 117 (03) Spinup time 125 125 38684787149 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5445 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12792 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4926 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5576 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5576 (C2) HDA temperature 122 122 249108824113 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	42.5% Average	Read 70.2 Write 78 Mixed 80.4 58% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 61%
NORELSYS 1081 32GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 24GB free, PID 1081 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 89.6 Write 20.4 Mixed 68.4 67% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.22 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.63 57% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C13D4/4GX KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2133C13D4/4GX KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2133C13D4/4GX KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2133C13D4/4GX KHX2400C15D4/4G 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	105% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 42.3 MC Mixed 39 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 20.1 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	760x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	113x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	86x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	39x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16