Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '17 at 03:07
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 219 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 678 67% 547 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49% Average	Lighting 60.5 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 60.6 49% 62.8 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 56 Splatting 53.9 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,320 Write 853 Mixed 1,028 237% 1,067 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 42.3 202% 78.5 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 188 195% 322 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 243%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 7GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4959711 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -7937099557334 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1896 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 337 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 43 1009320132633 (C2) HDA temperature 25 43 1009320132633 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4959711 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4959711 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4959711 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11545 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7299 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7299 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8026	81.2% Excellent	Read 517 Write 173 Mixed 264 69% 318 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 24.4 138% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 68.4 90% 163 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 130GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896960696 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3406 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5656 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3398 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3803 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3803 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 201863856159 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.8% Above average	Read 117 Write 81.3 Mixed 97.5 74% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.17 84% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 107%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 8,981 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 106GB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 296 Write 321 Mixed 259 219% 292 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.88 4K Mixed 0.26 118% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 184%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 42.3 MC Mixed 39.6 118% 41.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 22.1 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 59.3 68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	762x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	114x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16