Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '17 at 08:56
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 110 2-Core 228 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 884 79% 670 Pts	64-Core 1242 77% 1242 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 116 Parallax 104 88% 109 fps	MRender 96.7 Gravity 102 Splatting 94.6 80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 465GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 10 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14183 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2587 (B1) Unknown 89 89 124 (B3) Unknown 99 1 10 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 10 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 276 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 276 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1873 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24597986599	84.7% Excellent	Read 502 Write 349 Mixed 357 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 20.6 114% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 75.5 96% 172 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 465GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 11 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14183 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2578 (B1) Unknown 89 89 127 (B3) Unknown 99 1 11 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 11 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 88 (BE) vendor-specific 74 50 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 88 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1864 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25745556530	85.4% Excellent	Read 503 Write 348 Mixed 352 89% 401 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 21.6 117% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 72.5 93% 168 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 118%
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 480GB-$300 1,985 User benchmarks, average bench 144% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: OC34L5TP Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 809 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 5620 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1252 (64) Unknown 100 100 10210176 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 0 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 198 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 77 (B2) Unknown 100 100 26 (B4) Unknown 100 100 19022 (B3) Unknown 0 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 42 100 274879086634 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 809 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 598 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 809 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 21416 (F1) Unknown 100 100 16199 (F2) Unknown 100 100 12924 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 25800	144% Outstanding	Read 1,064 Write 936 Mixed 908 216% 969 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 18 118% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 17.2 69% 152 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 181%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 205 174 4750 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 301 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 286 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 109 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 71 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2651 (C2) HDA temperature 123 117 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	93.9% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 149 Mixed 144 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.25 110% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 26.4 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 21.6 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)