Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '17 at 15:43
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 850 1,360 User benchmarks, average bench 49% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 52.9 2-Core 105 49% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 211 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D8) 2GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 26.8 Parallax 32.8 32% 33.1 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 34.1 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16262 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3207 (B1) Unknown 87 87 464 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 189 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22128452378	44.5% Average	Read 449 Write 135 Mixed 193 56% 259 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 8.21 45% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 46.5 DQ Mixed 8.38 34% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 63%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 87GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5090 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5467 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 9781 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25956 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5104 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 56 353239061 (C2) HDA temperature 72 51 470679580 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 94134 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	46.9% Average	Read 83.5 Write 79.5 Mixed 87.5 63% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.41 113% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 116GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 163 6833 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3852 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17337 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3378 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 176 176 73726 (C2) HDA temperature 117 102 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.1% Average	Read 78.2 Write 75.3 Mixed 73.7 57% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.18 79% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5402-002.A01LF 99U5402-002.A01LF 9905403-176.A00LF 99U5474-041.A00LF 8GB 533, 533, 533, 533 MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.8% Poor	MC Read 13 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16