User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110629
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '17 at 19:33
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 67
1-Core 37.1
2-Core 75.8
39% 60 Pts
4-Core 63.6
8-Core 82.9
9% 73.2 Pts
64-Core 53.3
3% 53.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 3.31
3% 4 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 3.04
3% 3.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 58
Write 55.5
Mixed 53
42% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.34
74% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback