Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091103
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '17 at 22:22
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 86.9 47% 70.7 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 125 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E283) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.2 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 53.2 Reflection 59.2 Parallax 82.3 43% 64.9 fps	Gravity 53.6 Splatting 75.4 59% 64.5 fps
Poor: 41% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 41GB free Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 4714 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1205 (A5) Unknown 100 100 47263777019 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 31 (A8) Unknown 100 100 26 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8 (AE) Unknown 100 100 64 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 47 201864642590 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 6 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1181136716092 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1858 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2472 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1773 (F2) Unknown 253 253 6506 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	52.9% Above average	Read 335 Write 192 Mixed 208 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 15.8 78% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 40.3 47% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2183 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 654 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 52 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 40 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5082171233	64.9% Good	Read 348 Write 255 Mixed 220 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 24.7 100% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 97 DQ Mixed 49.3 54% 90 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0953 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (C2) HDA temperature 44 50 90194313260	58.8% Above average	Read 102 Write 103 Mixed 23.8 55% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.14 55% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 249GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 166 161 6675 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6913 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17638 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4133 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 123 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6912 (C2) HDA temperature 121 102 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	45.7% Average	Read 79.1 Write 80.2 Mixed 45.7 51% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.21 44% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 12.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 7.8 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA790FXT-UD5P Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	14x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	12x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	5x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	9x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	8x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16