Toshiba TECRA M10

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba TECRA M10 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090212
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '17 at 05:51
Run Duration	715 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P9600 6 User benchmarks, average bench 38% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 63.3 36% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 69.8 8-Core 65.1 9% 67.4 Pts	64-Core 73.1 4% 73.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 150M 153 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 0001) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.69 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.74 1% 0.96 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 116 135659044 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 12 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 89163521092581 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 396 (AB) Unknown 0 0 6 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 228 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 6 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 63 85903474723 (C2) HDA temperature 35 63 85903474723 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 135659044 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 12 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 135659044 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 135659044 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 86 86 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 58983 (EA) Unknown 0 0 44404 (F1) Unknown 0 0 44404 (F2) Unknown 0 0 54736	27.8% Poor	Read 171 Write 88.8 Mixed 102 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 8.66 40% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 85 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 27.5 35% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 73%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 19.4 Mixed 14.8 24% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.22 71% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 62%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 19.3 Mixed 12.3 23% 19 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.24 80% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 65%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 19.4 Mixed 7.56 20% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.19 59% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 62%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 19.3 Mixed 13.2 23% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.3 52% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 71%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 19.5 Mixed 9.45 21% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.52 53% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 52%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1.5TB 771 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 548GB free, PID 5031 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.43% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 19.2 Mixed 8.48 20% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.14 27% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.43% Great: 33%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 483GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 19 Mixed 18.8 26% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.17 48% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 71%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 41GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 24 Write 20.3 Mixed 21.5 28% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.21 62% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 71%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 15GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 19.8 Mixed 14.7 24% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.21 59% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TECRA M10 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Toshiba TECRA M10

CPU
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro NVS 150MNvidiaBench 1%, 153 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba TECRA M10

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Toshiba TECRA M10

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)