Hp-pavilion KE571AA-A2L m8325f

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KE571AA-A2L m8325f (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Benicia
Memory	3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 01 '17 at 01:02
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Memory 54.4 1-Core 27.7 2-Core 54.8 31% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 84.2 8-Core 110 12% 97.3 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7750 22,655 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E245) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 13.5 8% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 9.07 Splatting 16.2 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 36851 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 298 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 159 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 537122 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 65535 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 537122 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8791306	44% Average	Read 246 Write 163 Mixed 190 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 15.3 64% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 62.8 DQ Mixed 32.6 44% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 51%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 129GB free Firmware: 3.CHN Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6258 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 458441155 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15360 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3917 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 48 673644584 (C2) HDA temperature 40 52 55834574888 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 71 57 226431516 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	41.8% Average	Read 73.1 Write 72.4 Mixed 69.1 54% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.29 79% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 42%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137 3,651 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 85GB free Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 96 181796877 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5240 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 45 44 15861431826815 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 18335 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 16 (0C) Power cycle count 96 37 4240 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 7 3792514122620 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 589365283 (C2) HDA temperature 35 46 34359738403 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 20 181796877 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 178 3295	49.4% Average	Read 86.9 Write 85.1 Mixed 79.7 63% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.56 126% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KE571AA-A2L m8325f Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion KE571AA-A2L m8325f

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion KE571AA-A2L m8325f

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Hp-pavilion KE571AA-A2L m8325f

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)