| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A88-M EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141127 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 05 '17 at 00:47 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36.5%
Below average
|
39% 67.3 Pts
|
28% 231 Pts
|
19% 306 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
18% 19.2 fps
|
17% 21.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
54% 73.7 MB/s
|
71% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
17% 5.83 GB/s
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
21% 188 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A88-M EVO Builds (Compare 11 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A88-M EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 2x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 2x |
| FX-4170 Quad-CoreAMD $81Bench 56%, 4,257 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples | 2x |
| HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples | 2x |
| HD 7970AMD $435Bench 36%, 6,727 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $190 |