| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX V2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140911 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 06 '17 at 17:11 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.1%
Above average
|
53% 82.1 Pts
|
31% 258 Pts
|
19% 301 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 1090 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
25% 34 fps
|
28% 32.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
20% 26.2 MB/s
|
62% 0.66 MB/s
| |
|
|
67%
Good
|
83% 110 MB/s
|
30% 0.34 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.7%
Average
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
26% 9.23 GB/s
|
53% 75.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX V2 Builds (Compare 216 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX V2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 29x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 14x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $144 |