Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '17 at 14:19
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 197 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 690 64% 531 Pts	64-Core 943 58% 943 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 22DD) CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	23% Poor	Lighting 27.1 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 33.9 22% 30.7 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 25.2 Splatting 34.3 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 413GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 93 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (64) Unknown 100 100 33792 (65) Unknown 100 100 90368 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 5 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2771 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 158915297313 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 44 (EA) Unknown 100 100 33 (F1) Unknown 100 100 41 (F2) Unknown 100 100 345 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	65.1% Good	Read 468 Write 258 Mixed 140 63% 289 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 10.7 75% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 23.6 66% 145 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 92%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 6434555 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 77996606095503 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 137 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 68 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 42 85902098466 (C2) HDA temperature 34 42 85902098466 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6434555 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6434555 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6434555 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 414 (EA) Unknown 0 0 490 (F1) Unknown 0 0 490 (F2) Unknown 0 0 373 (F4) Unknown 100 100 393217	60.7% Good	Read 505 Write 195 Mixed 257 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 11.1 92% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 11.3 21% 40 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 84%
KINGSTON SV300S37A240G 240GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 143GB free, PID 6388 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 28.9 Write 26.2 Mixed 26.5 35% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 5.22 608% 8.51 MB/s	DQ Read 9.08 DQ Write 13.6 DQ Mixed 5.54 685% 9.41 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 185%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 5GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 67.7 Write 13.1 Mixed 19.1 32% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.58 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.19 40% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C13 2x8GB 2,810 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	76.1% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 25.9 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $86Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)