| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M4N98TD EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20110414 |
| Uptime | 5.7 Days |
| Run Date | May 09 '17 at 11:59 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 55% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
29.1%
Poor
|
30% 52.4 Pts
|
16% 123 Pts
|
8% 131 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
34.6%
Below average
|
37% 42.1 fps
|
30% 37.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
65.1%
Good
|
76% 102 MB/s
|
93% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
|
32.8%
Below average
|
41% 54.8 MB/s
|
103% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
|
22%
Poor
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
10% 3.67 GB/s
|
19% 208 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4N98TD EVO Builds (Compare 49 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4N98TD EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 12x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 11x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 5500AMDBench 3%, 5,613 samples | 3x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $311 |