Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160829
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 12 '17 at 19:34
Run Duration	378 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 106 2-Core 213 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 755 74% 609 Pts	64-Core 976 60% 976 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 111 Parallax 95.2 87% 105 fps	MRender 96.7 Gravity 99 Splatting 100 81% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 395GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7695 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1169 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 422 (F1) Unknown 99 99 610887027	94.4% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 407 Mixed 420 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 37 130% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 70.7 88% 156 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 134%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 362GB free Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 1,942 Write 1,522 Mixed 1,520 369% 1,661 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 91.9 4K Mixed 49 168% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 77.4 76% 122 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 262%
Samsung MZ7KM480HAHP-0E005 480GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 241GB free Firmware: GXM1003Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3201 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 706 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 3851 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 59 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 450 (F1) Unknown 99 99 657858376 (F2) Unknown 99 99 173233894 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 65535 (F6) Unknown 100 100 65535 (F7) Unknown 100 100 65535 (FB) Unknown 100 100 1032004424	104% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 489 Mixed 480 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 42.8 138% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 114 115% 186 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 126%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 237GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	252% Outstanding	Read 2,618 Write 1,681 Mixed 1,753 446% 2,018 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 28.2 139% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 38.9 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 29.1 34% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 353%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 208GB free Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 2,194 Write 1,187 Mixed 1,415 353% 1,599 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 40.2 153% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38.5 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 64.2 56% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 197GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13645 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 835 (B1) Unknown 98 98 115 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 314 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22046299574	99% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 497 Mixed 508 114% 508 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 38.1 129% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 104 97% 152 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 102GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13596 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 784 (B1) Unknown 99 99 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 64 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 413 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11016873208	99.9% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 497 Mixed 507 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 37.3 127% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 99.8 106% 175 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 124%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA614 4TB 361 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: A5GNW907 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 165 165 38678299060 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 707 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3548 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 707 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 894 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 894 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 227634577448 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83.9% Excellent	Read 146 Write 146 Mixed 141 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 4.62 4K Mixed 0.43 172% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 170 170 34378482051 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1738 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13577 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1622 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3423 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3423 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 180389871651 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	79.2% Very good	Read 171 Write 105 Mixed 121 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.19 90% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 820GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 163 163 34380185993 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1712 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13562 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1611 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2310 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2310 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 188979806244 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	63.1% Good	Read 135 Write 84.6 Mixed 116 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.16 88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 565GB free Firmware: MN6OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 131072 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 167 167 34378613133 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2688 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20972 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2597 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3547 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3547 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 180389871652 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47.1% Average	Read 86.1 Write 77.8 Mixed 69.6 58% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.21 92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 85%
WD WD4500HLHX-01JJPV0 450GB 847 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 335GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 198 7217 (03) Spinup time 232 232 3375 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3322 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23638 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3107 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 662 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2659 (C2) HDA temperature 116 103 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 180 0	79.2% Very good	Read 139 Write 136 Mixed 131 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 3.13 4K Mixed 0.62 176% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 45 MC Write 61 MC Mixed 47.2 146% 51.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	138x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	78x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $120Bench 421%, 18,218 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $623

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16