| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140806 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 14 '17 at 20:21 |
| Run Duration | 262 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.1%
Good
|
70% 120 Pts
|
35% 271 Pts
|
20% 323 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2871) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
|
22.5%
Poor
|
22% 29.1 fps
|
24% 30.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
66.1%
Good
|
75% 341 MB/s
|
100% 40.7 MB/s
|
60% 71.3 MB/s
|
|
|
46.7%
Average
|
61% 80.6 MB/s
|
101% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
3GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
6.77%
Terrible
|
12% 12.7 MB/s
|
27% 2.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.2%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 545 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 115x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 69x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 51x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 42x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 24x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $146 |