Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170509
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 17 '17 at 16:05
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 215 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 735 68% 565 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 3001) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Lighting 53.1 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 70.6 43% 53 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 52.1 Splatting 43.7 36% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 216GB free Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 33 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 11149735120495 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2293 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1679 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 30148 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 33 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 32139 (EA) Unknown 0 0 37456 (F1) Unknown 0 0 37456 (F2) Unknown 0 0 56353	38.7% Below average	Read 213 Write 173 Mixed 159 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 8.63 63% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 8.1 13% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 66%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18905 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4566 (B1) Unknown 88 88 430 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 197 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37643056097	55.5% Above average	Read 508 Write 207 Mixed 269 72% 328 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 10.7 64% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 63.9 DQ Mixed 10.6 30% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 18GB free Firmware: X211200 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 13636 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3527 (A7) Unknown 100 100 32 (A8) Unknown 100 100 121 (A9) Unknown 100 100 304 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 69 (AE) Unknown 100 100 141 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 45 193273659429 (D4) Unknown 100 100 219 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 542 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 542 (F1) Unknown 253 253 22038684287 (F2) Unknown 253 253 34291973751 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	52.3% Above average	Read 418 Write 212 Mixed 251 65% 294 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 11.9 73% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 43.6 DQ Mixed 44.4 31% 37 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.6% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 25.7 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 22.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	155x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16