| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130819 |
| Uptime | 6.6 Days |
| Run Date | May 17 '17 at 21:37 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.1%
Very good
|
59% 97.3 Pts
|
47% 385 Pts
|
31% 505 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.4%
Below average
|
34% 49.9 fps
|
42% 49.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
73.3%
Very good
|
80% 358 MB/s
|
97% 33.1 MB/s
|
70% 116 MB/s
|
|
|
72.3%
Very good
|
74% 335 MB/s
|
98% 31.6 MB/s
|
70% 123 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.1%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
58% 68.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 190x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 47x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 20x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 27x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 16x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $1,214 |