Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160622
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 12:09
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 100 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 63 2-Core 126 51% 85.7 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 531 46% 392 Pts	64-Core 1,643 102% 1,643 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 73.3 Reflection 74.3 Parallax 63.2 60% 70.3 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 67.9 56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 570GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5289 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1231 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 49 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 96 96 3644 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15251585323	74.3% Very good	Read 508 Write 400 Mixed 415 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 20.2 72% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 80.9 84% 138 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 121GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5635 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 278 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 42 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 60 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18261619891
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 79GB free Firmware: 11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6117 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4280 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 44 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2805 (C2) HDA temperature 70 47 227634053150	54.4% Above average	Read 482 Write 269 Mixed 265 74% 338 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 7.19 43% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 35.2 55% 107 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 83%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB 1,434 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6407 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5894 (B1) Unknown 91 91 321 (B2) Unknown 91 91 214 (B3) Unknown 92 92 403 (B4) Unknown 92 92 4845 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0	106% Outstanding	Read 913 Write 647 Mixed 651 163% 737 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 25.3 76% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 72.5 72% 114 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 160%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.8% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 11.2 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16