Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '17 at 19:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 136
60% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 429
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.2% Poor
Lighting 28.9
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 36.1
24% 31.5 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 25.3
26% 32 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 366
Write 316
Mixed 316
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 20.8
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 54.6
66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
300GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 30.2
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.29
80% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 114%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
65GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 115
Mixed 112
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 2.75
4K Mixed 0.35
133% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback