| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160122 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 24 '17 at 15:24 |
| Run Duration | 83 Seconds |
| Run User | VNM-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.7%
Good
|
71% 123 Pts
|
33% 249 Pts
|
17% 271 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
32% 32.4 fps
|
24% 29.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
85.3%
Excellent
|
111% 147 MB/s
|
115% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.4%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
27% 9.57 GB/s
|
50% 80 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 789 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $92
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 118x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 88x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 69x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $314 |