ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '15 at 10:06
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 116 2-Core 233 79% 175 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 459 61% 458 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 2543) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 12.9 12% 13.1 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 14.9 11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 93004617 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 109306917700271 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 481 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 15 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 93004617 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 93004617 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 93004617 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8309 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5735 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5735 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15001	67.5% Good	Read 505 Write 131 Mixed 185 59% 274 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 19.3 111% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 42 62% 118 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 402GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 160 4850 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3355 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 30873 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 746 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 165 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3354 (C2) HDA temperature 117 95 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.3% Good	Read 110 Write 100 Mixed 105 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.41 115% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 349GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 67 67 10760 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3237 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 21660 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 427 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 454164507 (C2) HDA temperature 77 57 487718935 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 90080 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	32.8% Below average	Read 47.4 Write 66.4 Mixed 58.4 43% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.34 100% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 62%
Seagate Desktop 2TB 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1.5TB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 39.1 Write 39.9 Mixed 14.6 38% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 19%
Iomega External HD 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 931GB free, PID 0276 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 40.6 Mixed 21.7 42% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,519x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	947x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	556x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	309x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	268x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	236x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	173x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $581

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback