Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '17 at 20:43
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 116
59% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 325
36% 281 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.38
4% 4.49 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46% Average
Read 94.3
Write 65.8
Mixed 62.7
56% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.2
79% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
910GB free
Firmware: CC3H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 117
Write 104
Mixed 93.7
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.53
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
763GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 151
Write 122
Mixed 118
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 167
Mixed 160
137% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.37
142% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 17.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback