Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '17 at 07:14
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105 8,721 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 145 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 242 30% 232 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2039 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Lighting 78.1 Reflection 82 Parallax 78 64% 79.4 fps	MRender 72.7 Gravity 73.4 Splatting 78.3 62% 74.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 129 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 277 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 56 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 53 53 47123 (EB) Unknown 99 99 108 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1706994611	99% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 399 Mixed 417 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 40.8 149% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 88.3 92% 154 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 55GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4879367 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 117682103929620 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2351 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 434 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 49 77312622627 (C2) HDA temperature 35 49 77312622627 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4879367 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4879367 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4879367 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8031 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5314 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5314 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16788	76.7% Very good	Read 514 Write 210 Mixed 267 72% 331 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 22.8 118% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 55.4 79% 147 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 176 5950 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6263 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15816 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3763 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 547 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 176 176 72324 (C2) HDA temperature 113 105 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 57083 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.5% Above average	Read 83.4 Write 96 Mixed 71.9 63% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.22 82% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 920GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 179 5808 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3523 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10235 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3320 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 418 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6444 (C2) HDA temperature 113 106 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 117 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	72.9% Very good	Read 172 Write 81.8 Mixed 105 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.23 96% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 844GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 178 5925 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6333 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17040 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4042 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 490 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 174 174 79333 (C2) HDA temperature 111 105 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	62.4% Good	Read 117 Write 101 Mixed 88.9 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.18 79% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 239GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 167 2308 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2454 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19004 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2297 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 403 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2120 (C2) HDA temperature 107 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.4% Good	Read 93 Write 142 Mixed 111 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.22 96% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.8% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 17.8 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 13.4 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	10x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	10x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	5x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	5x

SSD
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 2,884 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $323

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16