Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI
Memory	3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '17 at 04:00
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 153 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 383 41% 325 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: Press Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 68 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 82.2 55% 70.9 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 55.7 51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 917 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 225 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 64 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3964207199	62.3% Good	Read 262 Write 213 Mixed 218 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 33.9 113% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 19.2 33% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 534GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 170 4191 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2002 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7799 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1407 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 446 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1555 (C2) HDA temperature 122 97 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75.5% Very good	Read 140 Write 123 Mixed 119 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.31 97% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 74%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 37GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 27 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5160 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3049 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13313 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2379 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 97 27 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 890 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 85 58 252641295 (C2) HDA temperature 84 58 269418512 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 7247 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	41.3% Average	Read 71.5 Write 72.2 Mixed 74.2 55% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.4 105% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.1 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Flaming Blade GTI Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	13x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	7x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	2x
GeForce 8600 GTSNvidiaBench 2%, 2,598 samples	2x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	9x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	9x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16