Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H270M-Gaming3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170425
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '17 at 05:05
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 16.9 1-Core 44 2-Core 103 27% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 368 33% 280 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.1% Good	Lighting 68 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 104 55% 76.7 fps	MRender 97.9 Gravity 108 Splatting 92.7 81% 99.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56 10,555 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFZ10.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C2) HDA temperature 64 63 158915231780 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6226	76% Very good	Read 483 Write 422 Mixed 463 102% 456 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 9.93 81% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 17.3 57% 126 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 7440 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2866 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 24 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 5256712597 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 38618 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2861 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 97 90195690073 (BD) vendor-specific 75 75 25 (BE) vendor-specific 62 44 159553749030 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1288 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3019 (C2) HDA temperature 38 56 81604378662 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 10 7440 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4946 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -101902394026599 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3759303388 (F2) Unknown 100 253 305660370	64.8% Good	Read 116 Write 110 Mixed 80.8 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.4 70% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 75%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 677GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 12884902069 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 8 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 8 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 171800199205 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	78.8% Very good	Read 142 Write 133 Mixed 121 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.14 38% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x16GB 2,591 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 344 12% 344 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	35x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	34x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	5x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	5x
KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GBKingstonBench 82%, 206 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16