Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJun 22 '17 at 06:18
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 141
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 414
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.5% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 115
Parallax 102
82% 106 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 85.5
75% 92.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,120
Write 660
Mixed 791
190% 857 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 26.7
161% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 55.1
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 21.3
41% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 137%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 374
Mixed 406
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 40
128% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 20.9
34% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
75GB free
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 427
Write 115
Mixed 167
51% 236 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 14.5
77% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 26.3
27% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 73%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23
879GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 119
Write 107
Mixed 105
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 0.22
89% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 87%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
445GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 166
Mixed 169
130% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.37
130% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback