Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '17 at 13:11
Run Duration	418 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 940-$79 2,107 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 95.2 1-Core 85 2-Core 170 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 340 46% 340 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.4 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 14.8 14% 15.3 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 17.5 12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4095 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 724 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 195 (AD) Unknown 100 100 917562 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 24 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 86 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6136	49.7% Average	Read 371 Write 163 Mixed 181 52% 239 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 10.1 60% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 40.4 63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 97%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 174 6066 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5766 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27173 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4575 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 161 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 325344 (C2) HDA temperature 118 98 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.8% Average	Read 93.6 Write 76.2 Mixed 64.6 58% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 63%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 908GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 165402160 (03) Spinup time 91 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4107 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 57 8599528545 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12342 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2345 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 206161575984 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 69 62 180910030879 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 87 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 41041 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 -140737488355297 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 32358283614549 (F1) Unknown 100 253 16110063114 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12837302673	70.3% Very good	Read 127 Write 119 Mixed 22.7 65% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.22 72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 96%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6545, Kingston 16 GB Data Traveler SE3 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 2.88 Mixed 4.12 9% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.47 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.004 28% 2.49 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 15.3 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 56.4 71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16