IBM System x3650 M4 Server -[7915AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive390% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemIBM System x3650 M4 Server -[7915AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00W2609
Memory136.5 GB free of 144 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '17 at 23:07
Run Duration65 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 39
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 91.6
33% 58 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 550
44% 385 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.46
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
390% Outstanding
Read 3,074
Write 3,496
Mixed 4,209
808% 3,593 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 49
157% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 54
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 60.5
57% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 390%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B... 144GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback