ADD TO PC
BUILD

Ga-h67m GA-H67M

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Ga-h67m GA-H67M (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '17 at 11:41
Run Duration	337 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 179 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 462 49% 393 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435 6,727 User benchmarks, average bench 36% PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 53.7 29% 39.6 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 45.9 Splatting 37.3 31% 37.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 109 22029996 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -106412109722832 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2053 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 63 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 22029996 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 22029996 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 22029996 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9779 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11347 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11347 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9734	37.1% Below average	Read 184 Write 93.2 Mixed 106 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 11.1 68% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 91.3 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 29.6 41% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 38GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 165 6533 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2279 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2833 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2056 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 172 172 85925 (C2) HDA temperature 120 112 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.5% Below average	Read 46.5 Write 66.4 Mixed 5.16 28% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.17 66% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 69%
SAMSUNG HN-M500MBB 500GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 151GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 28 Write 24.3 Mixed 24.8 32% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.33 79% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 41%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Read 12 Write 5.42 Mixed 7.73 10% 8.37 MB/s	4K Read 3.58 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.32 41% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 4x4GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.8% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 13.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback