Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131224
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '17 at 20:15
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 69.8 39% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 369 36% 295 Pts	64-Core 411 25% 411 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.8% Above average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 52.2 Parallax 112 37% 69.7 fps	MRender 98.3 Gravity 103 Splatting 104 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 32164 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 971 (B1) Unknown 83 83 599 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 137 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37525292155	32.3% Below average	Read 242 Write 127 Mixed 151 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 10.1 42% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 61.9 DQ Write 37.4 DQ Mixed 21.2 23% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 76%
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB 4,859 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 24GB free Firmware: DXM01D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3530 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 92 92 270 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4576 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8779936872 (F2) Unknown 99 99 16640533796	39.2% Below average	Read 328 Write 107 Mixed 146 42% 194 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 14 55% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 70.8 DQ Write 52.5 DQ Mixed 34 33% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 177GB free Firmware: A7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 100 69 (03) Spinup time 116 100 17192714438 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1442 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 103 98 39 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10167 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 233 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 421724194 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 10697 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 10697 (C2) HDA temperature 176 142 184684445730 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	119% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 227 Mixed 235 164% 217 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 3.47 4K Mixed 0.27 108% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 177GB free Firmware: A7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 100 71 (03) Spinup time 120 100 12897353920 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1411 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 100 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10154 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 229 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 196608 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 61 421658657 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 10133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 10133 (C2) HDA temperature 181 153 167504642081 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 145GB free Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 169 4400 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11018 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 39 39 44801 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2213 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 918 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10099 (C2) HDA temperature 101 86 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.5% Average	Read 80.5 Write 64.4 Mixed 72.2 55% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 65GB free Firmware: 1118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 67 67 10670 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12548 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 44808 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2520 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 655425574 (C2) HDA temperature 61 49 672202791 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 439398 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	38.6% Below average	Read 65.1 Write 69 Mixed 73 52% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.22 77% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 11,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.7 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	253x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	162x
Core i7-3960XIntel $265Bench 78%, 2,165 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	31x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	11x
DDR3 1600G DDR3 1600G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GBAdataBench 52%, 28 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16